[Freedombox-discuss] Unforgivable Hacks for AGPL Compliance
- Subject: [Freedombox-discuss] Unforgivable Hacks for AGPL Compliance
- From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Walter van Holst)
- Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 08:40:08 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 51835BC8.email@example.com>
- In-reply-to: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
On 4/30/13 5:15 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
> Meanwhile, the FUD we hear against Affero GPL is almost exactly the same
> as the GPL FUD that I heard when I first got started in Free Software in
> the early 1990s, right on through to the "unAmerican cancerous virus"
> campaign in 2001. The GPL was successful, and accepted as a norm,
> almost completely because there were codebases (GCC, Linux, etc.) that
> were *so* useful that copyleft haters chose to live with copyleft
> requirements -- whatever they might be -- rather than write new code
> from scratch.
> I've told cwebber many times that such codebases just don't exist yet
> for Affero GPL, and that's the root of all the so-called "I don't
> understand how to comply with Affero GPL" problems. I hope GNU
While I strongly believe in free software, I don't think it is entirely
FUD. Especially in the context of Freedom Box I think the AGPL may have
interesting consequences. Or none (see last issue of International Free
and Open Source Source Law Review).