[Freedombox-discuss] Handling Projects Across Multiple Hosting Services
Quoting Nick M. Daly (2013-03-03 04:19:47)
> Hi folks, what're your thoughts on managing issues and wikis across
> repositories, between source hosting services?
>
> For example, to encourage commits and to be system independent,
> FreedomBuddy is hosted on both Github [0] and Gitorious [1]. These
> two systems don't share wikis, much less issue trackers. That's
> problematic and hardly "distributed" at all.
I'd say use Debian wiki and Debian Alioth for FreedomBox development,
and leave it to each upstream project to pick whatever they see fit: The
more that can have a life untied from FreedomBox the better!
For upstream projects that seek to avoid a central point of failure I
recommend Ikiwiki as wiki with git as storage, and SD (Small Defects)
for issue tracking. Both are packaged for Debian.
I am not familiar with fossil but it seems from a quick glance to be
possible to host locally but not (easily?) to distribute to avoid your
local host to become a single point of failure.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/freedombox-discuss/attachments/20130303/1e821760/attachment.pgp>
Reply to: