[Freedombox-discuss] Building a personal software stack
Quoting Melvin Carvalho (2013-01-05 02:43:28)
> On 29 December 2012 18:30, Petar Petrovi? <petar at petrovic.io> wrote:
>> I think that we don't HAVE to integrate everything, at least not
>> during the initial development. I think we should focus on building a
>> software stack, and then at some point, we can decide if deep
>> integration is worth the effort. Of course, I am always open for
>> different opinions and ideas.
Yes, let's build FreedomBox 1.0 before we build FreedomBox 2.0.
In my mind, FreedomBox 1.0 is *boring* - it contains no new inventions,
only oldfashioned Debian mechanisms served user-friendly boxed. That in
itself is a *big* milestone for FreedomBox.
FreedomBox 2.0 is *interesting* - it contains improved ways of doing
stuff classic among geeks, and still does it user-friendly boxed.
FreedomBox 3.0 is *exciting* - it contains new inventions that have
happened in parallel to our "boring" work, inspired by similar events
that triggered the FreedomBox project but without that tough contraint
of being user-friendly. Of course when those inventions reach
FreedomBox they _are_ provided user-friendly boxed - because that is a
fundamental requirement of FreedomBox.
We (as in the developers on FreedomBox) HAVE to integrate everything
needed for serving privacy-aware functionality in a user-friendly way.
If we don't, we don't have a FreedomBox, but some other Debian-related
tool or toy.
> Yes, I think this is a valid approach.? The web was designed to tie
> many systems together via the hyperlink.
True that the web is about tying many systems together.
FreedomBox, however, is about protecting privacy, and here it does
matter crucially to have enough functionality locally so as to not leak
privacy when doing said hyperlinking.
FreedomBox is also about serving non-geeks, and here it is crucial that
all interaction is user-friendly. *ALL* interaction! There is *no*
admin, beyond the user herself/himself!
> Of course it would be nice if the integrations could provide a
> seamless user experience, but perhaps that can only happen over
If you mean postponing user-friendliness till later, then it sounds to
me like you are talking about something (quite exciting and worthwhile
to try reach but) different from Freedombox.
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 836 bytes