[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Freedombox-discuss] have you seen this Hardware?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/25/2012 01:00 PM, Dieter Thimm wrote:
> Hi Jonatan,
> 
> i think this link is better:
> 
> http://cubieboard.org/
> 

Not that I could find.

> and
> 
> http://dl.cubieboard.org/hardware/cubieboard_schematic_2012-08-08.pdf
>
> 
Yes, in the schematic there is a reference to RTL8201CP which is
manufactured by Realtek and described here,

*
http://www.realtek.com.tw/products/productsView.aspx?Langid=1&PFid=13&Level=5&Conn=4&ProdID=27

* http://realtek.info/pdf/rtl8201cp.pdf

That was an answer, thanks! I'll look closer at that design at some
later point if noone beats me to it. At least doesn't seem to be
USB-based like the Raspberry Pi.

I find this to be an important point for freedombox since running a
freedombox without good networking would be quite useless.

// jwalck

> this will answer your questions?
> 
> What i like is, the small size and the SATA connector, i think this
> fits the need off FB nearly perfect.
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> 
> Dieter
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=WcJO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: