[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Freedombox-discuss] who wants the new look to go online?



On 12-09-30 at 07:24pm, Robert Martinez wrote:
> On 28/09/12 22:59, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >Thanks, but I am not sure what you really invite me to join

I dislike your quoting style: above is missing essential parts of the 
sentence, distorting its meaning.



> "usable and maintainable design" - sounds good!
> I guess what you mean is a more or less a "working wiki theme".

No, that is not what I mean.  What I mean is what I pointed out in July 
on this list, as referenced in my previous post.

I am happy to elaborate on that if interested.



> >I suggest as next step to figure out how the website admins are willing
> >to receive a new visual design (if at all).
> 
> Isn't that another way of phrasing my initial two questions:
> Who is in charge of the wiki server?
> What does it take to update the wiki?

Yes.  Above is a response to your slightly different question apparently 
aimed directly at me, however.



> (The question "if at all" should not arise afaik, since there
> already is an ok from James Vasile)

Evidently an that ok from James Vasile did not make website admins 
willing to receive a new visual design, or we wouldn't have this 
conversation.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/freedombox-discuss/attachments/20120930/8007b741/attachment.pgp>


Reply to: