[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Freedombox-discuss] who wants the new look to go online?



On 28/09/12 21:39, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> How can I see what it looks like?
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Robert Martinez <mail at mray.de>
>> To: freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 3:29 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Freedombox-discuss] who wants the new look to go online?
>>
>>
>> On 28/09/12 13:47, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>>   Summarizing like that is not really encouraging.
>>>
>>>   For my own part, I tried clarify how it makes sense for me to engage in
>>>   a maintainable(!) webdesign.  It is my impression that there is (or was)
>>>   not much interest from others in working as I wanted, so I didn't push
>>>   that further: I shall not stop you from approaching this however you
>>>   want - but please do not interpret that as complete lack of interest.
>> Great!
>> If the freedom to do it your way encourages you - join me!
>> I really don't care what happens under the hood, I came up with the design,
>> html & css code.
>> My interested lies in getting it live finally.
>>
>>>   I find it quite relevant to coordinate with the maintainers of the
>>>   website how to apply design for it.  Or recognize that if a design is
>>>   developed without coordination, it will most likely take additional time
>>>   and effort to restructure for those who administrate the website.  That
>>>   does not (necessarily) mean that they are hibernating.
>> I *do* try to get in touch with the maintainers of the page here! Hence the
>> questions.
>> Of course the necessary changes will take some time, no matter who will take
>> care of it.
>>
>> What do you consider to do as a next step?
>>
>>
>> Robert
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freedombox-discuss mailing list
>> Freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org
>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
>>




Reply to: