[Freedombox-discuss] [FBox-Visual] New FBx Foundation Website Theme
- Subject: [Freedombox-discuss] [FBox-Visual] New FBx Foundation Website Theme
- From: email@example.com (James Vasile)
- Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 08:37:29 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] firstname.lastname@example.org>
- In-reply-to: <4F762E47.email@example.com>
- References: <4F75E597.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <4F762E47.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Robert has been the master of the logo. If you two are happy, I'm
happy, as I defer to your expertise.
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:05:59 -0400, Sean O'Brien <me at seandiggity.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the quick feedback. You're right about the shadows looking
> like scrollbars, esp. on a small screen. I can fix that in a few ways,
> and still keep the shadow look, definitely make sure those pixels don't
> show on small screens.
> The rest just takes some CSS tweaks, and the logotype is a discussion
> for whomever is making those decisions. I have mixed feelings about
> it...although it distinguishes the logo from the butterfly logo for the
> box itself, it also is a little busy (lotta letters to squeeze in
> there). So maybe it's something to fix with typography tweaks, maybe
> "foundation" has to go.
> ~ Sean
> On 03/30/2012 01:13 PM, James Vasile wrote:
> > Nice. That is already a huge improvement over what we currently have.
> > The thin vertical columns on left and right look on my screen like
> > scroll bars. That strikes me as a bug.
> > Should "Foundation" be in the logotype along with FreedomBox?
> > The line spacing in "Enabling Private\nConversations Online" is a bit
> > wide.
> > Aside from those minor comments, that is excellent.
> > Thanks,
> > James
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: not available