[Freedombox-discuss] Freedombox-discuss Digest, Vol 21, Issue 2
- Subject: [Freedombox-discuss] Freedombox-discuss Digest, Vol 21, Issue 2
- From: tornow at riseup.net (firstname.lastname@example.org)
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 17:48:41 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] email@example.com>
- In-reply-to: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- References: <email@example.com>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 11:47:38 +0200
> From: Robert Martinez <mail at mray.de>
> To: freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org
> Subject: Re: [Freedombox-discuss] The video
> Message-ID: <4F7975BA.90002 at mray.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> On 02/04/12 11:35, Rob van der Hoeven wrote:
> > Another idea. Why don't we host our videos on our own server?
> > All our video's are hosted on commercial websites like youtube,
> > vimeo etc. Shouldn't we protect our visitors from these snooping
> > companies?
> > Rob.
> > http://freedomboxblog.nl
> I guess this would be an extra effort and result a bunch of new
> challanges. (cloud services perform more reliable and stable probably)
> *.webm via HTML5 <video> on our own server would be practising what
> we preach :D
> But lets first care about having a proper video at all!
> Freedombox-discuss mailing list
> Freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org
> End of Freedombox-discuss Digest, Vol 21, Issue 2
I am not much in videos, but have recommended:
to people not happy with vimeo or youtoube, and they have been happy
with that instead.
As far i know mediagoblin added support for video short ago
(it's a very "young" project, sure).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available