[Freedombox-discuss] http://politics.slashdot.org/story/11/07/18/0153204/Security-Consultants-Wa rn-About-PROTECT-IP-Act

[abhidg@gmail.com (Abhishek Dasgupta)]

On 20 July 2011 19:14,  <bertagaz at ptitcanardnoir.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 08:46:38AM -0400, James Vasile wrote:
[...]
>> Dynamic DNS run by a freedom loving group sounds great. I'd use it.  It
>> also sounds like a whole separate project in addition to the FreedomBox.
>> I'm not going to tackle that any time soon, but I'd certainly cooperate
>> with anybody who does.
>
> But then, how would the freedombox interconnect to each others? How would
> they be reachable for people outside of the freedombox network? Should
> avery onwer register by herself a domain, and then be quite alone and
> vulnerable to shutdown/blacklist?
>
> This project can't just rely on the Tor hidden service onion names, not
> everyone will want to have this only solution.
>
> bert.
>

Why not use dyndns/freeDNS for the time being? gnudip2.sourceforge.net
is another option, though it does not seem to be maintained anymore.

-- 
Abhishek