[Freedombox-discuss] Why FreedomBox would not be a router ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/05/2011 06:51 PM, Marc Manthey wrote:
> http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/babel/
> http://www.open-mesh.org/
Right now we're leaning toward using Babel, but we've gotten both
protocols working at the same time.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_mesh_network
With the capability for non-mesh nodes to use the network as they would
any wireless network. Services use SSLv3/TLSv1 to encrypt traffic, and
we're looking at IPsec in opportunistic mode to encrypt inter-mesh node
traffic. About half of our service stack has been defined, the other
half is still in discussion. We've begun assembling the live
distribution of Linux using Porteus (http://porteus.org/) as our
platform. I have plans for a Debian metapackage, but that's going to be
a ways off.
- --
The Doctor [412/724/301/703]
PGP: 0x807B17C1 / 7960 1CDC 85C9 0B63 8D9F DD89 3BD8 FF2B 807B 17C1
WWW: http://drwho.virtadpt.net/
"My God, it's full of porn!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk4UnHIACgkQO9j/K4B7F8EsiACdGxYMt8vfaqGVfistE0v1Sxfo
S/4AoN/ELLD4uvTBF82BqBuuHNd3+lq9
=Z5DU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: