[Freedombox-discuss] FOAF developers taking FreedomBox into their equation
On 10 March 2011 00:02, Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 10:29:06PM +0000, Clint Adams wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 09:09:25PM +0100, Henry Story wrote:
>>>
>>> ?I am also currently chairing the WebID incubator group at the W3C, ? so
>>> if you have WebID questions don't hesitate to ping me, or join ? the W3C
>>> mailing list and ping there.
>>
>>
>> I hope that in the long run we are going to want to rid ourselves of
>> any dependence on centralized DNS and SSL certificate authorities.
>> Is WebID going to have any features to facilitate this or are we going
>> to need to have a separate CA certificate for each client or server
>> certificate, and a bunch of out-of-band validation hacks to ensure
>> that these SSL certificates and FOAF profiles are actually owned
>> and controlled by the people we expect them to be?
>
> WebID rely on DNS, but do not require _centralized_ DNS.
>
> WebID use SSL certificates, but do not require _centralized_ certificate
> authorities, Actually, due to requiring an unusual additional hint, some
> centralized CA autorities including CAcert.org cannot currently provide
> WebID compatible certificates.
Traditionally we've always 'self signed' our WebID certificates. So
there's no CA that needs to be in the loop. In fact, I dont know of
any instance WebID has *ever* been used with a CA, but I suppose it is
possible too. :)
>
>
>
> ?- Jonas
>
> --
> ?* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
> ?* Tlf.: +45 40843136 ?Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
>
> ?[x] quote me freely ?[ ] ask before reusing ?[ ] keep private
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJNeAcMAAoJECx8MUbBoAEh7e0P/iRSFrEacOhLs+dUU7A3ZNTy
> VoFWMJ/VSCi5WtKMn2Tm68WKCQuo+mIussDZOR89VJyDehCaj5WRHcMQjnKxssc1
> yHBRKsq0eCmQiE/6855J+tsn0TrKhjYTXnqrIFJtJ2Vflz0JFTg5rbMii9OuEnMD
> ectyehUPxUul9Ri9Ta0m5Dyf81HFnDZzDqC5goMiTBo063oc57LOma9P3ZKWaIjC
> 7vK/P50+q4MEfOQ86mmKcx+S0v6uGlbr67gxgpXyu7SJeAjnn5wUS90Uo7A5+MUa
> /J7SJ992wP9mQdsPcSIQ9Wsz83AmPYZ1mv+v2BBQqtn930gxRXWvaertcXG729lI
> E+wMk7oYwLRo7BKQ/Tw31RKAd8gq48ZkDegOo+wjJgrF52iJYoau1eYf/AwkAs0V
> 4dRwXLIZOqke9Ct8+czxzmcba/lMngLZdVyKry5ywqoUEStD0cwinEUcL82zoaZg
> 7xxghPO+WyomlJ4wnFiInADAT2LK9z87tFpTXCMp7e9JxQGfHU8Tgo4kJFPk1kSB
> ODayWJmu5sb/hpnQNns+e09hN1SqLkJMfb7mpW3OHETEiyfLSQvNxSh5MqfAIG0y
> /effztx0CDlbBI7ZDfsYjL0KJp5GJkXc8Iau9hQnwVvEQTpbGnv8obAldAddmDK3
> T5oZ7OeSOVT3GfeC2dqk
> =F+TU
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freedombox-discuss mailing list
> Freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
>
>
Reply to: