[Freedombox-discuss] NAS or little-space-sheevaplug, the HD question
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 10:47:37AM +0100, Gianluca Moro wrote:
>hi all,
>
>On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Matt Zimmerman <mdz at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 05:49:29PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>>
>> I would take the "cloud" aspect a bit further, and consider whether
>> online storage could be used for more than just backup. I don't
>> think the FB needs to be completely self-contained, so long as it
>> preserves individual autonomy and control, and provides the services
>> that people want.
>>
>
>I have been working a bit in this direction, where the base idea is "my
>freedom box needs to let me the complete control of the data" but this
>control do not imply "physical control of the data".
>
>I implemented a proof of concept in my cloudusb project, where I keep
>programs and data encrypted in a bootable USB stick, with an online
>backup of encrypted data, so to use on line resources but keeping the
>control thru' encryption.
>
>This could be applied in other configuration too: for example, to have
>some data only online (crypted) so to have minimum local hardware
>requirements.
How do you control logging of access to that cloud-stored data?
A fair answer is "I don't care about surveillance of accessing encrypted
data", but then you do not have _complete_ control.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/freedombox-discuss/attachments/20101108/1395d380/attachment.pgp>
Reply to: