A format conversion is listed explicitly in the ofl as modification triggering rfn permission / renaming, and converting source to binary is a kind of format change
> What is the relationship between the googlefonts repos and the google
> fonts repo? It seems a bit weird to have two places for the same stuff.
Looking at the repos, the google fonts repo contains the built, ie
ready made files, while the googlefonts repo the sources.
Not that this is an explanation - but just for understanding what is where.
> > BTW I believe that Debian must rename all OFL-RFN fonts (just as with
> > Firefox.)
Why? If the fonts are taken as is it seems to be fine, I don't se
any need for name change. The RFN clause is about *changed* fonts,
as far as I remember.
Norbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
------------------------------------------------------------------------