Re: Down to 10 ?able packages.

To: Henry Hollenberg <speed@barney.iamerica.net>
Cc: debian-firewall@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Down to 10 ?able packages.
From: Martin Schulze <joey@kuolema.Infodrom.North.DE>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 21:11:08 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980304211108.47378@kuolema>
Reply-to: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.north.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.95.980304123047.1682S-100000@barney.iamerica.net>; from Henry Hollenberg on Wed, Mar 04, 1998 at 12:41:28PM -0600
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.95.980304123047.1682S-100000@barney.iamerica.net>

On Wed, Mar 04, 1998 at 12:41:28PM -0600, Henry Hollenberg wrote:

> Package: smail     _cut_  .vs. Replace with qmail?

Qmail isn't even non-free and cannot even be considered as an
alternative.

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
  / Martin Schulze  *  joey@infodrom.north.de  *  26129 Oldenburg /
 /                                     http://home.pages.de/~joey/
/ Kernel-Patching in DOS? Selten so gelacht!   -- Jochen Schoof /


--
E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to debian-firewall-request@lists.debian.org
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble?  e-mail to listmaster@debian.org .

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Down to 10 ?able packages.
  - From: Henry Hollenberg <speed@barney.iamerica.net>

References:
- Down to 10 ?able packages.
  - From: Henry Hollenberg <speed@barney.iamerica.net>

Prev by Date: Re: CAll for standard bastion smtp: ssmtp
Next by Date: Re: CAll for standard bastion smtp: ssmtp
Previous by thread: Down to 10 ?able packages.
Next by thread: Re: Down to 10 ?able packages.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread