[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: First draft of the LinuxTag-booth



On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 08:09:49PM +0200, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> On Sun, 05 May 2002, Thimo Neubauer wrote:
> > - the Alpha, because Alphas aren't that well known but deserve
> >   it. Actually, Compaq released EV7 and is successfully building
> >   fast clusters with them; at least universities may be interested
> 
> If you say "the Alpha", you may think about the one I offered, but you
> should keep in mind, that this is a quite old machine, which takes
> nearly two hours to compile a 2.2 kernel. See
> http://www.spinnaker.de/sailnet/fock-en.html for more information
> about the machine.
> 
> So if someone has a faster machine, it may be a better demonstration
> object.  Nobody should think that Debian on Alpha is slow, only
> because my machine is old...

Well, I've got a faster Alpha but it's serving as escher.debian.org :)
I think that the most important thing to show is that an Alpha can be
used just like a i386 with Debian. Maybe someone could collect
SPEC-values for different Alphas. Running banchmarks on LinuxTag would
only make sense if we had very recent machines...

> Maybe we should think about a second i386 machine which can be used to
> demonstrate or explain some questions about a visitor.  There are many
> thinks I don't know about Debian but most times I know where to look
> for it.  But for this I need Internet access and/or a full featured
> Debian machine.  Yes, I know, that such a machine can be misused by
> developers to read the email, but that's a question of booth policy ;-)

Well, with an Alpha and hopefully a loaned Sparc an additional i386
wouldn't hurt. But that should be it.

CU
    Thimo

-- 
Thimo Neubauer <thimo@debian.org>
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 frozen! See http://www.debian.org/ for details

Attachment: pgpMXuf7XDouQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: