[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: PostgreSQL 9.2.x & Debian 9.x/Stretch compatibility?



Hello Peter,

Thanks for the valuable information.

After going through available options, I decide to go with Docker & Debian 9
Docker is still serving postgresql 9.2.22 repo at =
https://hub.docker.com/r/library/postgres/tags/

Regards,
Amey.

On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 at 19:01, Peter Brunnengraeber
<pbrunnen@bccglobal.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Amey,
>   We did run 9.2 for a few weeks on Stretch without issue as part of a migration earlier this year, but we had to build the packages ourselves. Nothing stock exists that I'm aware of.  It is do-able, but I would not recommend it for a production environment.  I do not believe that the 9.2 train is still maintained with any updates, so there are some serious risks your taking on.
>
> -With kind Regards, Peter.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Amey Abhyankar" <sco1984@gmail.com>
> To: zenaan@freedbms.net
> Cc: "debian-enterprise" <debian-enterprise@lists.debian.org>
> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 1:32:59 AM
> Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 9.2.x & Debian 9.x/Stretch compatibility?
>
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 at 17:19, Zenaan Harkness <zenaan@freedbms.net> wrote:
> >
> > Best to post to debian-user mailing list...
>
> It was a question for DB admins from enterprise space.
>
> My mistake was I did not elaborate = I want to do physical replication
> of postgresql 9.2.x due to specific case study. And as per my
> knowledge, it is not possible to do physical replication of postgresql
> DB between 2 major versions/releases.
>
> So if any1 is using postgresql 9.2.x version on Debian Stretch, It'll
> be easier for me to proceed.
>
> Regards,
> Amey.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 04:01:09PM +0530, Amey Abhyankar wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I want to install PostgreSQL 9.2.x on Debian 9.x/Stretch.
> > > Anybody is using this combination?
> > > If yes what is your feedback?
> > > PostgreSQL 9.2.x is stable on Debian 9?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Amey.
> > >
>


Reply to: