Re: foreign bootstrap
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 04:36:48PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 09:55:59AM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 07:27:17PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > > Personally, I think that a tool which does emulated configuration of a
> > > rootfs is and should be entirely separate from multistrap. I don't
> > > think polystrap is the right name either, it isn't about the
> > > bootstrapping, it's about configuration under emulation. I have never
> > > wanted to rely on emulation and I want no part of such support.
> > I'm really bad at choosing names. I would be really glad if somebody
> > could suggest one that is fitting better.
> foreign bootstrap finisher
On second thought:
Polystrap is a foreign bootstrap builder and finisher, fbbf