On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 19:26 +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote: > On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 06:14:57PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > >On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 18:47 +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote: > > >> 4) bugfix divert > >> dpkg-divert didn't work for me. I fixed this up > > > >Is there a patch for that fix up? Is just changing the diversion name > >really sufficient? > > No it isn't. > It's the block with dpkg-divert in the patch that was attached, two oneliners. OK, not easy to pick those out of a single long patch - the oneliners won't patch out of context. The typo for arm->$arch is in 1.1.6 (just released). These I'll put into SVN for Simon to test (r4195). http://buildd.emdebian.org/svn/changeset/4195 Should be OK for 1.2.0 for Debian unstable later this week. If you can update the other patches against current SVN it would make things easier. Your first patch failed to apply cleanly to emchain from 1.1.4 (i.e. before the current changes). patching file emchain Hunk #2 FAILED at 719. Hunk #3 FAILED at 803. Hunk #4 FAILED at 841. Hunk #5 FAILED at 850. Hunk #6 FAILED at 908. Hunk #7 succeeded at 918 with fuzz 2. 5 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file emchain.rej Thanks. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part