Hello, On Sat 20 Sep 2025 at 03:57pm -07, Xiyue Deng wrote: > I should have explained the root cause in the first paragraph. Or is > there anything still unclear? Right, sorry. I meant that, switching to arch:any is a workaround, so there is some limitation of one of the relevant packaging tools you are working around, so it would be worth figuring out if that issue could be fixed, instead, before abusing arch:any. I understand why DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH would be amd64 for an arch:all package, I think, but I don't know the background of how the DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH variable is being used in this package, but it seems like not using that variable would be a better solution. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature