Hello, On Wed 05 Mar 2025 at 02:39am -08, Xiyue Deng wrote: > Ah, sounds good. This may work and doesn't require a stable update. > Also I think technically we only need a "Breaks: dh-elpa (<< 2.1.2)" so > that it won't further complicate the dh-elpa migration. As the only thing for which we have hard evidence is that dh-elpa 2.1.7 works, I used that in the Breaks relation. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature