Hi Sean, Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> writes: > Source: dap-mode > Version: 0.7-5 > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 2.3, 4.5, 12.5 > > Dear maintainer, > > Sorry I missed this during RFS review, but d/copyright is wrong > regarding CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, which has its own license and copyright. > Question for my own understanding: is a code of conduct considered a type of license? Some initial Googling suggests that a code of conduct is not a license (but they also don't claim their certainty on the matter.) Personally I also have some doubt, as a code of conduct doesn't seem to state how a software is used or distributed, but how the developers and users should interact as people. If a code of conduct is not consider a license, then I see no issue here, as there is not any separate explicit license specifically for this file. > -- > Sean Whitton -- Regards, Xiyue Deng
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature