Hi Adrian, Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> writes: > On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 10:09:03PM -0500, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> Hi Adrian, > > Hi Nicholas, > >> Thank you for checking in with this bug! Please let me know ASAP if >> another autoremoval exception will be provided, because if necessary I >> can do the shady thing of disabling tests to buy time...but I'd really >> prefer not to! > > I am not a member of a release team, just a normal developer. > ACK :-) > Personally, I would go with disabling some (or all) tests if the package > is overally working and the tests are the only worry for missing bullseye. > Basic functionality is ok, depending on the working definition of "basic", but my feeling is that it's a minefield for intermediate and advanced use of the IDE features due to a big wave of breaking changes introduced by various dependencies in the period right between this bug was filed, continuing until shortly before our soft freeze. Active upstream issues that affect Elpy in bullseye have been multiplying, and at this point I'm starting to find it strange that this (#975535) is the only reported bug. The primary maintainer has injured hands and will be AFK for a while as he recovers. The second maintainer has a new job and no time, but my hope is the upstream community will band together in time to get Elpy into a good state in time for bullseye. I will contribute what I can, but worry that it won't be enough. Coordination is occurring here: https://github.com/jorgenschaefer/elpy/issues/1884 Regards, Nicholas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature