Bug#923908: new upstream version available (9.2)
On 15/03 22:45, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> While triaging bugs I just noticed this one is marked fixed but is
> still open. Was it left open as a reminder to backport bullseye's
> org-mode?
I believe that was the rationale at the time.
> Does arch:all elpa-org-mode need a formal bpo, or will adding testing
> or sid apt source in combination with pinning work well enough?
Package pinning should work fine, but if enough users request a proper
stable backport I guess it could also be maintained.
Cheers,
--
Seb
Reply to: