Re: emacsen-team salsa usage
David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:
> Lev Lamberov <dogsleg@debian.org> writes:
>
>
>> To avoid many feature branches (= avoid atomised packaging work, which
>> is mentioned by Nicholas) I propose to have a single branch for
>> unreleased. Or one may checkout the latest tag (corresponding to the
>> version in unstable) when performing a mass upload.
>>
>
> I guess if we agree it's the maintainers problem to rebase / merge their
> unreleased changes onto the unstable branch before uploading, having a
> single branch for unreleased changes would work for me. I would even be
> fine with that being called master, and having a known good branch
> corresponding to sid. Maybe debian/master for WIP, and debian/unstbale for
> actual uploaded state.
just master for WIP would be less of a conflict with DEP14, fwiw.
d
Reply to: