Hello, On Mon 02 Sep 2019 at 09:27AM -03, David Bremner wrote: > 1) Please check your merge requests on salsa. For 13 packages where I > could not cleanly rebuild against master (or whatever the default HEAD > is), I did a merge request for the changes. Thanks for the note -- my notification settings were wrong, of course. > 2) It would be great if we as a team could decide on one or two git > workflows, and maybe record them somehow in the repo. The current > situation creates extra work for team wide uploads. I have packages using gbp, git-debrebase and dgit-maint-merge(7). I don't think we could drop gbp because we have team members who prefer it. Similarly, I would object to being asked not to use git-debrebase because I strongly prefer it to gbp. I don't mind dropping dgit-maint-merge(7) usage for the sake of uniformity. Do you have many git-debcherry packages? > 3) Another potentially controversial idea is to have master (or whatever > "debcheckout -a" fetches) always buildable and corresponding to > unstable. This would require all UNRELEASED changelogs live on > branches Would this help anything other than these pseudo-arch:all binNMUs? -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature