[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#912281: marked as done (elpa-devscripts: please change Recommends to elpa-dpkg-dev-el instead of dpkg-dev-el)



Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2018 12:51:08 +0000
with message-id <E1gHTUC-0008Gs-0o@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#912281: fixed in devscripts-el 40.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #912281,
regarding elpa-devscripts: please change Recommends to elpa-dpkg-dev-el instead of dpkg-dev-el
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
912281: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=912281
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: elpa-devscripts
Version: 40.1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Hi!

Thanks for all your work on these packages!

I notice that elpa-devscripts currently Recommends dpkg-dev-el rather
than elpa-dpkg-dev-el.  Please could you change this?

(Also, I notice that these are the only two elpa-* packages which end
with -el.  Wouldn't it make more sense to name them elpa-dpkg-dev and
elpa-debian?  To change it would need two transitional packages
elpa-dpkg-dev-el and elpa-debian-el which could be presumably be
dropped before the freeze, as these two packages only exist in
testing, or at least immediately after the release of buster.)

Best wishes,

   Julian

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: devscripts-el
Source-Version: 40.2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
devscripts-el, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 912281@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
David Bremner <bremner@debian.org> (supplier of updated devscripts-el package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 08:51:46 -0300
Source: devscripts-el
Binary: elpa-devscripts devscripts-el
Architecture: source
Version: 40.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Emacsen team <debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: David Bremner <bremner@debian.org>
Description:
 devscripts-el - Transition package, devscripts-el to elpa-devscripts
 elpa-devscripts - Emacs wrappers for the commands in devscripts
Closes: 912281
Changes:
 devscripts-el (40.2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Bug fix: "please change Recommends to elpa-dpkg-dev-el instead of
     dpkg-dev-el", thanks to Julian Gilbey (Closes: #912281).
Checksums-Sha1:
 995bc8e59739b4dbc9f1b27f325f8bd527f827a1 1625 devscripts-el_40.2.dsc
 d3ec4205872fb668d465e883f9e3c1dd2ef94951 9304 devscripts-el_40.2.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 e131537cbb3989458586aa782b79267c50e87d87977510730d03494b87c1b197 1625 devscripts-el_40.2.dsc
 b84a02816f37ee48acb541b224fb2d1890beb67d629d458b858eb08d420fb474 9304 devscripts-el_40.2.tar.xz
Files:
 f9bc39ba5eae49145e21eab2a7a3b30d 1625 lisp optional devscripts-el_40.2.dsc
 44d4f94736d79ad9bbee68feca92d7af 9304 lisp optional devscripts-el_40.2.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQGzBAEBCAAdFiEE3VS2dnyDRXKVCQCp8gKXHaSnniwFAlvYR6kACgkQ8gKXHaSn
niyf0gv+OFXlzREPVQPi/oi9ScEfPnKQXwOYNHKz/ZckESg0nmdyk+R5SI36jatR
F3lLuuLqq0sq3DOsXfCaF1s53Zq47yu6L8FOgvXLgwhL3J0ylsmq2hUjO7i/M9jX
wKT2alXakTGgl5Wm9zTQOp+MwuaXfFVg1x9uBVyVyBpFttPM6IYMbtF80dsXTw21
gwbBMq+3cYoGVjL/CQujEO/OLW2etlZTe4O0s4AjkYpXFvKV8vHWq0PTVaSKVRGL
86FnmwWCDleUmMUldO2IYti//XmHsb5IuDiZOnRnonZNZ5wMQq0sCnx+/iRPsX1n
md2uu5PVi5iorC8Z9erJqj1NNhhM5WIe6GVRwjK6O0RTqGU4s0bcVyvGxKqnhhIh
BAVdbQDGJ6ZzO/ffc/mbL3QEiZqq21ZeYbYV0aQ5pOq1ompq5APQBfv7paCsiEir
7DNq8ADLw1TEtma0PRjTKs2ZBFSkKE+pYm+ES1XZo6XeplxI+Mt9WyzNWirOvv4X
zUgI1pDl
=AF23
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply to: