Re: lintian: Severity and Certainty of emacsen-common-without-dh-elpa are wrong / false positives despite "Certainty: certain"
- To: David Bremner <bremner@debian.org>
- Cc: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>, 906281@bugs.debian.org, Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>, Debian Emacsen team <debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org>, Nicholas D Steeves <nsteeves@gmail.com>
- Subject: Re: lintian: Severity and Certainty of emacsen-common-without-dh-elpa are wrong / false positives despite "Certainty: certain"
- From: Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 00:35:50 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20181026223549.GT4613@sym.noone.org>
- Mail-followup-to: David Bremner <bremner@debian.org>, Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>, 906281@bugs.debian.org, Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>, Debian Emacsen team <debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org>, Nicholas D Steeves <nsteeves@gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87woq4y07f.fsf@tethera.net>
- References: <1536493762.108588.1501823736.0C2DD786@webmail.messagingengine.com> <[🔎] 1540579625.2865103.1555989864.37241601@webmail.messagingengine.com> <[🔎] 87woq4y07f.fsf@tethera.net>
Hi,
David Bremner wrote:
> >> So, what are the next, concrete, steps for Lintian here? I don't
> >> currently see a consensus...?
> >
> > Gentle ping on this folks?
>
> I fixed the dh_elpa bug #905464 which originally triggered this
> discussion, so from my point of view the lintian warning is OK. Maybe
> Axel can comment if/when he has a chance to try converting tpp dh_elpa
> again? I did a quick and dirty conversion myself, but there could still
> be e.g. documentation issues.
Will check, thanks for the reminder.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
Reply to: