Hello, On Sun, May 27 2018, Rob Browning wrote: > Looks good -- though we'll have to ponder how we want to handle epochs > (now that the unversioned package needs to add one). Sean said that > there was a DEP suggesting they be included in versions via "%", > e.g. 1%20180414-1+git836dce6. > > I'm not sure what I think about that yet -- locally I've just created > two tags VERSION and 1%VERSION. If there's no harm in that, then > maybe it'd be the most flexible... http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep14/ Various tools already respect this convention so it's not really just a suggestion anymore, and I can't see a good reason for breaking it. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature