Re: Slimming emacs-nox
Hi,
I don't read debian-emacsen regularily, so this is probably a rather
late reply.
Rob Browning wrote:
> Jeffrey has suggested removing additional features from emacs-nox to
> make it smaller, and so I thought I'd raise the issue here to see what
> others think.
>
> cf. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828702
>
> configure arguments proposed:
[...]
> --without-gpm
Please don't drop GPM support. IMHO it's rather important if you use
emacs without X on a console.
I'm totally happy with all the other suggested parameters, especially
with "--without-dbus". Having the possibility to have an emacs package
without pulling dbus bloat in would be great.
> I'm also wary about removing gpm, sound, and dbus. They seem
> potentially useful with or without X.
I don't see any usefulness of keeping dbus support. Where do I need
that?
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
Reply to: