Re: emacs lucid vs. gtk and -iconic -xrm
Hi,
Sean Whitton wrote:
> Since this isn't a Debian-specific question, you might have more luck
> asking here: <https://emacs.stackexchange.com/>
Not necessarily. Found it here first, then searched over there at
Emacs StackExchange for the according question
(https://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/23935/emacs-lucid-vs-gtk-and-iconic-xrm)
and added this comment there:
It may also be an issue with the GTK version being used since GTK
seems to break the -geometry option (see
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=760944) then and when
(according to https://sourceforge.net/p/roxterm/bugs/125/#6e97) which
even makes some software developers to give up their own
projects (the upstream of roxterm gave up, see
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827768#5).
Nevertheless the aforementioned case can't affect a Wheezy-vs-Jessie
thing since it happened only recently (see e.g. the roxterm RC bug at
https://bugs.debian.org/821357) and the bugs only affect Debian
Unstable/Testing at the moment.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
Reply to: