Re: Bug handling for removed emacs21/emacs22 packages?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 10/01/2010 07:45 AM, Tommi Vainikainen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> all four emacs21, emacs21-non-dfsg, emacs22 and emacs22-non-dfsg
> packages have been now removed from both squeeze and sid. All four packages
> have some amount of open bugs.
>
> I could help handling those bugs, but how should I proceed? AFAIK only
> submitter or maintainer should close bugs, so is it bad behaviour if I
> just properly close some bugs which have IMHO been fixed/handled by
> removing the packages? Can I also reassign rest of the bugs to emacs23
> packages, or what should be done for those?
>
> It seems that amount of open bugs for all GNU emacs packages is quite
> enormous, and some of those are quite old.
>
Hey Tommi,
Not speaking for the maintainers or anything like that, but there is
some general documentation for the kind of thing you are interested in
helping with.
See: http://wiki.debian.org/BugTriage
Regards,
- --
Jordan Metzmeier
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)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=Lute
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: