Re: New DFSG-compliant emacs packages
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:13:49 +0900, Miles Bader <miles.bader@necel.com> said:
> Personally, if I (1) like something, but (2) don't like some small
> aspect of it, I'd rather try to change that aspect rather than
> switching to something else. I think this is by far the most
> productive approach.
That's sensible. But hectoring the Debian emacs maintainer,
or even raising this subject on debian-emacsen, is not a particularly
efficient, or even marginally effective, means of achieving that
goal. If Debian's decision on the GFDL is to be altered, there was
the private Debian FSF discussion on the GFDL, and then there is the
debian-project mailing list (where discussion of the GFDL is
more on topic than this list).
manoj
--
QOTD: "Who? Me? No, no, NO!! But I do sell rugs."
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: