+++ David Kastrup [27/10/06 23:03 +0200]:
Mike O'Connor <stew@vireo.org> writes: What freedom of the user is protected by removing GFDLed documentation from Emacs?
Do you understand why debian believes the documents are non-free in the first place? Do you understand that debian aims to be comprised 100% of free software, and that debian doesn't make a distinction between code and documentation when determining what is software?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature