Re: New DFSG-compliant emacs packages
David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
> Jim McCloskey <mcclosk@ucsc.edu> writes:
>
> > +++ David Kastrup [26/10/06 17:25 +0200] wrote:
> >
> > |> Since Emacs is not really useful without its online docs, the
> > |> incomplete version in main helps nobody.
> >
> > I use Emacs constantly; I virtually never use the online docs. I'd be
> > dead without the `incomplete' version in main,
>
> If all it takes for you to commit suicide is to have some Debian
> package moved completely to non-free, when it is easy enough to
> compile the software on your own, you should call a
> M-x doctor RET
To follow-up on my previous message, flip that question around and ask
yourself the same question about the doc package?
Reply to: