Re: New DFSG-compliant emacs packages
Mike O'Connor <stew@vireo.org> writes:
> +++ David Kastrup [26/10/06 17:25 +0200]:
>>>
>>Since Emacs is not really useful without its online docs, the
>>incomplete version in main helps nobody.
>
> I find emacs extremely useful, with or without docs. I'm suprised
> that you wouldn't find it to be useful, or that you would think that
> there is nobody that would be helped by having emacs available.
Emacs would remain available in non-free.
> I think that removing emacs from debian completely would hinder more
> than it helps. This suggestion seems more like lashing out from a
> "sore loser" than someon who is actually trying to be constructive.
How is the proposal to move Emacs completely and intact to non-free
unconstructive? Do you consider your ad-hominems and name-calling
constructive?
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
Reply to: