Re: Gnus Manual License
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 11:34:13 +0200, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> said:
> If I were in the position of a Debian maintainer (which I am not), I
> would consider GFDLed documentation with the standard GNU project
> cover texts in their _current_ form sufficient for inclusion into
> main as long as no invariant sections are involved.
This would be enough to get the package removed from main by
the FTP masters: the general resolution that was passed (by a 3:1
super majority) has moved such decisions out of individual hands;
deciding to include these cover texts would not be a violation of the
social contract.
manoj
--
It destroys one's nerves to be amiable every day to the same human
being. Benjamin Disraeli
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: