Re: Slime ?

To: Olivier TÃ©tard <toutoune25@free.fr>
Cc: debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Slime ?
From: Peter S Galbraith <psg@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:23:51 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060130142351.F130710A70A@mixing.qc.dfo.ca>
In-reply-to: Message from Olivier TÃ©tard <toutoune25@free.fr> of "Mon, 30 Jan 2006 05:40:31 EST." <M0GK-D.A.xWH.H1e3DB@murphy>
References: <M0GK-D.A.xWH.H1e3DB@murphy>

Olivier TÃ©tard <toutoune25@free.fr> wrote:

> Xavier Maillard <zedek@gnu.org> a tapotÃ© :
> 
> > Just curious but why is it in non-free ? I thought it was licensed
> > under the terms of the GPL. Am I wrong ?
> 
> Slime is licensed under the GPL but one file (xref.lisp) seems to be
> non-free. You can learn more in this thread[1].
> 
> 1.
> http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/slime-devel/2005-September/004058.html
> 
> Olivier.

>From that post:

  Are without licenses:
  swank-ecl.lisp
  ChangeLog
  doc/Makefile
  HACKING
  NEWS
  PROBLEMS
  README

Being without a license means you can't distribute it at all.  You might
have a problem with swank-ecl.lisp in that case.

-- 
Peter

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Re: Slime ?
Next by Date: Re: Slime ?
Previous by thread: Re: Slime ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread