Re: Testers wanted: Tramp 2.1

To: Vincent Bernat <bernat@luffy.cx>
Cc: debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Testers wanted: Tramp 2.1
From: Romain Francoise <rfrancoise@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:27:02 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87ll0vvx4p.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] m3mzlbujdt.fsf@neo.luffy.cx> (Vincent Bernat's message of "Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:09:18 +0200")
References: <[🔎] 877jcfxf6r.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <[🔎] m3mzlbujdt.fsf@neo.luffy.cx>

Vincent Bernat <bernat@luffy.cx> writes:

> Should we use this one if we are using emacs-snapshot (which has
> already Tramp included) ?

The tramp package in unstable and the version shipped in emacs-snapshot
are the stable series, currently at 2.0.51 (as noted in the changelog).

The tramp package in experimental is the development series, currently
at 2.1.4.  It will shadow the emacs-snapshot version of Tramp if you
install it.

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :' :        Romain Francoise <rfrancoise@debian.org>
 `. `'         http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/
   `-

Reply to:

References:
- Testers wanted: Tramp 2.1
  - From: Romain Francoise <rfrancoise@debian.org>
- Re: Testers wanted: Tramp 2.1
  - From: Vincent Bernat <bernat@luffy.cx>

Prev by Date: Re: Testers wanted: Tramp 2.1
Next by Date: Name for new package for VM extras?
Previous by thread: Re: Testers wanted: Tramp 2.1
Next by thread: Name for new package for VM extras?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread