Re: New from emacs-snapshot
Quoting Daniel Brockman <daniel@brockman.se>:
> > That's right. I'll see if I can change that.
>
> What's wrong with the way you are currently doing it?
Nothing, I think. Weren't you suggesting making changes in emacs21?
> >>> I think we could avoid patching Makefile.in
>
> [...]
>
> >>> What do you think? (I haven't tested)
> >>
> >> Ah, yes, that looks great. I didn't realize that locallisppath is
> >> only used in that one place in Makefile.in.
> >>
> >> I will try building with this change.
> >
> > Good. Thanks.
>
> I've built it, and it works perfectly!
Very nice! Thanks for testing!
I'll try to commit your changes today, along with my work on
splitting misc-unseparated.dpatch.
> > BTW, I have a patch for configure.in which eliminates the need for
> > calling epaths-force after running configure. I'll submit it
> > to emacs-devel ASAP.
>
> That sounds great. Does it add a --locallisppath parameter?
Yes. --enable-locallisppath even.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
Reply to: