[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: incompatibility of *.elc between xemacs21-mule and xemacs21-nomule



>>>>> On Sat, 22 Jun 2002 18:59:04 +0900 (JST), Tatsuya Kinoshita <tats@iris.ne.jp> said:

 Tatsuya> I found a bug of mew package that mew doesn't work on
 Tatsuya> xemacs21-nomule.  (Bug#150432)

If a package depends on the mule capabilities of xemacs then it should
depend on xemacs21-mule | xemacs21-mule-canna-wnn |
xemacs21-gnome-mule | xemacs21-gnome-mule-canna-wnn (looking at this
now it seems a bit long, but that's the current state).

When compiling it should look for one of those binaries rather than
just running xemacs21.

 Tatsuya> The cause of this problem is that, *.elc file that is
 Tatsuya> compiled with xemacs21-mule is not compatible with
 Tatsuya> xemacs21-nomule.

It looked to me like the problem is that the nomule version won't
compile els that depend on mule features.  Correct me if I'm wrong.

 Tatsuya> In the bug report, I suggested using *.el with
 Tatsuya> xemacs21-nomule, but it's not so smart.

 Tatsuya> I wish the xemacs21-nomule flavor were defined.

Huh?

Jim

-- 
@James LewisMoss <dres@debian.org>      |  Blessed Be!
@    http://people.debian.org/~dres     |  Linux is kewl!
@"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-emacsen-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: