[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#879022: marked as done (fwupd: FTBFS on alpha and hppa: -fstack-protector not supported)

Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2017 20:28:28 +0000
with message-id <13b6f12abb1d42c28fd48473b016aed4@ausx13mpc120.AMER.DELL.COM>
and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #879022,
regarding fwupd: FTBFS on alpha and hppa: -fstack-protector not supported
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

879022: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=879022
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: fwupd
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: debian-alpha@lists.debian.org

The latest builds of fwupd for alpha and hppa (admittedly not release
architectures) failed:

  cc1: error: -fstack-protector not supported for this target [-Werror]
  cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
  ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.

Curiously, meson reports

  Compiler for C supports argument -fstack-protector-strong: YES

on both architectures.  Could you please take a look?


Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?amu@monk.mit.edu

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

Fixed in fwupd 1.0.0-2 by backported upstream changes

--- End Message ---

Reply to: