[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Post installation network problem



Hi Folks,

I've got a problem with a freshly installed tjener:
Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX100 S1, 8GB RAM
onboard Intel NIC (enp0s25 during installation)
PCIe Intel Fibre NIC (enp1s0)

The later should serve the 10.0.0.0/8 net, the copper one is in reserve.

Installation over fibre, getting 10.0.2.2 via dhcp from my configured Fritz Box ran fine. Chose Main Server and Workstation, but no ltsp (don't need it here) and partitioned manually.

after installation, /etc/network/interfaces was configured this way:

auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
    dns-search intern
    dns-nameservers 127.0.0.1

auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
    address 10.0.2.2
    netmask 255.0.0.0
    broadcast 10.255.255.255
    gateway 10.0.0.1
# The commented lines below is to be used if a DHCP server is in use
#iface eth1 inet dhcp

iface eth1 inet dhcp

But: eth0 is the disconnected copper onboard nic and eth1 the fibre card!

So i edited /etc/network/interfaces

auto eth1
iface eth1 inet static
    address 10.0.2.2
    netmask 255.0.0.0
    broadcast 10.255.255.255
    gateway 10.0.0.1

iface eth0 inet static
	address 192.168.1.2
	netmask 255.255.255.0
	broadcast 192.168.1.255

and restarted.

Now I can reach tjener from the 10.0.0.0/8 net, but tjener doesn't reach the world outside of this network:

root@tjener:~# ping debian.org
ping: debian.org: Der Name oder der Dienst ist nicht bekannt

Some diagnostic, that didn't help me solve the prob:

root@tjener:~# route
Kernel-IP-Routentabelle
Ziel      Router          Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
default   gateway.intern  0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth1
10.0.0.0  0.0.0.0         255.0.0.0       U     0      0        0 eth1

root@tjener:~# ip address
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
    inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 ::1/128 scope host
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:19:99:77:d3:4f brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    altname enp0s25
3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:15:17:aa:20:a6 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    altname enp1s0
    inet 10.0.2.2/8 brd 10.255.255.255 scope global eth1
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 fe80::215:17ff:feaa:20a6/64 scope link
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

root@tjener:~# ifconfig -a
eth0: flags=4098<BROADCAST,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
        ether 00:19:99:77:d3:4f  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
        RX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
        device interrupt 20  memory 0xd8400000-d8420000

eth1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
        inet 10.0.2.2  netmask 255.0.0.0  broadcast 10.255.255.255
        inet6 fe80::215:17ff:feaa:20a6  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>
        ether 00:15:17:aa:20:a6  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
        RX packets 81766  bytes 9343586 (8.9 MiB)
        RX errors 0  dropped 15  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 80884  bytes 8743572 (8.3 MiB)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
        device interrupt 16  memory 0xd8020000-d8040000

lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING>  mtu 65536
        inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
        inet6 ::1  prefixlen 128  scopeid 0x10<host>
        loop  txqueuelen 1000  (Lokale Schleife)
        RX packets 3806  bytes 647541 (632.3 KiB)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 3806  bytes 647541 (632.3 KiB)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

and shure: dhcp is deactivated on the Fritz Box!

Any suggestions what's going wrong?

Kind regards

readU
Frank


Reply to: