[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#762906: krb5-auth-dialog debug output



On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 10:00:32AM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> 
> ...and the process keeps runnng? Is that all the output you're seeing?
> IN that case that's probably not the debug build.

You're right, ran it on the wrong vm. This is the output using the debug
build:

test@tjener:~$ killall -s9 krb5-auth-dialog
test@tjener:~$ krb5-auth-dialog

** (krb5-auth-dialog:3265): WARNING **: Couldn't register with 
accessibility bus: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the 
remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy 
blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection 
was broken.
DEBUG: ka_applet_set_property: principal: 
DEBUG: ka_applet_set_property: pk-userid: 
DEBUG: ka_applet_set_property: pk-anchors: 
DEBUG: ka_applet_set_property: pw-prompt-mins: 30
DEBUG: ka_applet_set_property: tgt-forwardable: False
DEBUG: ka_applet_set_property: tgt-proxiable: False
DEBUG: ka_applet_set_property: tgt-renewable: False
DEBUG: ka_applet_set_property: conf-tickets: False
DEBUG: ka_applet_set_property: principal: 
DEBUG: ka_applet_set_property: pk-userid: 
DEBUG: ka_applet_set_property: pk-anchors: 
DEBUG: ka_applet_set_property: pw-prompt-mins: 30
DEBUG: ka_applet_set_property: tgt-forwardable: False
DEBUG: ka_applet_set_property: tgt-proxiable: False
DEBUG: ka_applet_set_property: tgt-renewable: False
DEBUG: ka_applet_set_property: conf-tickets: False
DEBUG: ka_applet_local_command_line: Parsing local command line
DEBUG: ka_applet_startup: Primary application
DEBUG: ka_nm_client_state_changed_cb: Network connected
DEBUG: monitor_ccache: Monitoring /tmp/krb5cc_1000_w9KVYa
DEBUG: ka_applet_command_line: Evaluating command line
DEBUG: credentials_expiring: Checking expiry <1800s
DEBUG: ka_nm_client_state_changed_cb: Network connected
DEBUG: credentials_expiring: Checking expiry <1800s

Wolfgang

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: