On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 09:57:09PM +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote: > On Mo 21 Jan 2013 16:46:33 CET Wolfgang Schweer wrote: > >On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 03:25:24PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > >>On Montag, 21. Januar 2013, Wolfgang Schweer wrote: > >>> > > New Revision: 78794 > >>> > > +# FIXME: Check this for jessie > >>> > why do we need this plugin again? didnt we do this already for > >>> > squeeze? > >>> gosa-plugin-netgroups isn't available in wheezy (bug #682747). for > > The problem with gosa-plugin-netgroups was, that the upstream > changes in the plugin that were needed for 2.7 compatibility were > only provided by GONICUS very shore before the wheezy freeze. Too > short. The GOsa² packaging team offered to include the netgroups > plugin into the build infrastructure of the gosa src:package, but > for this it was also too late at that time. > > >>> squeeze there was am imo ugly solution > >>> (debian-edu-gosa-plugin-netgrups). > >> > >>why do you think this was ugly and how did you implement this > >>differently now? > > > >it was implemented as the (virtual) package > > not as a virtual package. The upstream code was in src:package > debian-edu-config. The build process of src:package > debian-edu-config created a bin:package named > debian-edu-config-gosa-netgroups. This bit of code was hacked on the > dev meeting in 2011 in Hamburg. > > >debian-edu-config-gosa-netgrroups, causing bug #662947 > > /me wonders if there is a typo in the bug number... the quoted bug > seems totally unrelated... you probably also mean #682747 here? typo, should've been #662967 Wolfgang
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature