Re: LDAP server scaling problem?
[José Luis Redrejo Rodríguez]
> As you said in a previous email, in Extremadura we had the same
> problems. With the iddletimeout option they were fixed. You need to
> have many concurrent users to notice the problems ( aprox. more than
> 100), and I guess that's why there are not more people complaining, as
> this concurrency is not very usual.
Yeah. What value for idletimeout did you use? I've tried 1200 (20
minutes) and 600 (10 minutes). Am considering going even lower, but am
not trying with 'ulimit -n 8192' to see how that work.
> Since May we have updated our ldap servers to Squeeze, and we have had
> no problems up to now, with idletimeout=0 .
Right. Good to hear. Upgrading is an option, but not a very good one
for the installation at the moment.
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
Reply to: