[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Gosa vs. CipUX



Hi,

Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi Petter, hi Klaus,
> 
> On Fr 07 Jan 2011 11:01:34 CET Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> 
>> [Klaus Knopper]
>>> Hi Petter,
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>>> Ok, here I am, at least for LINBO and italc-rlp. What do I need to
>>> do now?
>>
>> I would suggest showing up on IRC to coordinate, to a test
>> installation of the squeeze-test ISOs and figure out what need to
>> change on the installed system to integrate the two tools to work out
>> of the box (which I have no idea what is doing).  When you know what
>> need to change, see if this configuration / setup can be done using
>> preseeding ( -> add preseeding settings to debian-edu-install),
>> editing of existing files ( -> create cfengine rules in
>> debian-edu-config cf/) or by adding extra files ( -> add them to
>> debian-edu-config).  If some script need to run during installation to
>> dynamically adjust the setup at install time, a combination of these
>> might be needed.
>>
>> When changes are done to the packages in svn, one of us with upload
>> right can upload it into our test repository to get new ISOs for
>> testing.
> 
> as far as I know, LINBO is not in Debian at all and italc-rlp sounds
> like a modification of the original italc software (which is already
> packaged for Debian).
> 
> Thus, as far as I understand,
> 
> (1) some effort has to be put in filing an Debian ITP (intent to package
> for Debian) for LINBO and
> 
> (2) the Debian italc package and italc-rlp have to checked against each
> other (I do not known about the differences of italc and italc-rlp and
> their development history). There probably is some more communication
> needed between upstream italc, italc-rlp and the package maintainer (if
> these are three differnt parties)...
> 
> I would love to see iTalc and LINBO move into Skolelinux...

+1

Cheers
C.


Reply to: