Re: should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?

To: debian-edu@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?
From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:07:22 +0200
Message-id: <201010301807.22945.holger@layer-acht.org>
In-reply-to: <20101030155751.GA12654@flashgordon>
References: <201010301535.11459.holger@layer-acht.org> <20101030141241.GA5089@login1.uio.no> <20101030155751.GA12654@flashgordon>

Hi,

On Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
> Let's drop blender. It's about the size of a kernel and will hardly be
> used in any school.

Good idea.


cheers,
	Holger

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to:

References:
- should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?
  - From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Re: should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?
  - From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
- Re: should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?
  - From: "Andreas B. Mundt" <andi.mundt@web.de>

Prev by Date: debian-edu-config_1.443_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Next by Date: svn statistics
Previous by thread: Re: should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?
Next by thread: Re: should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread