Re: should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?

To: debian-edu@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 17:48:50 +0200
Message-id: <20101030154850.GB5089@login1.uio.no>
In-reply-to: <201010301629.01250.holger@layer-acht.org>
References: <201010301535.11459.holger@layer-acht.org> <201010301604.04220.holger@layer-acht.org> <20101030141241.GA5089@login1.uio.no> <201010301629.01250.holger@layer-acht.org>

[Holger Levsen]
> I seriously doubt that. 
> 
> We have to have the 486 kernel only for those people running ancient
> hardware.
> 
> LTSP works fine with 686.

Well, LTSP failed to install from DVD when I updated the list of
kernels to included on the DVD.

I assume you have tested that this no longer is the case, given that
you claim that I am not telling the truth.

Nothing would make me happer, as the 686 kernel is a better
alternative for modern hardware.

Happy hacking,
-- 
Petter Reinholdtsen

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?
  - From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>

References:
- should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?
  - From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Re: should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?
  - From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Re: should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?
  - From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
- Re: should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?
  - From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>

Prev by Date: debian-edu-config_1.443_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Next by Date: Re: should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?
Previous by thread: Re: should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?
Next by thread: Re: should we really avoid the 686 kernel image?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread