[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: More on the future LDAP admin gui in Debian Edu



Hi,

On Montag, 25. Oktober 2010, Klaus Knopper wrote:
> Sounds nice, and I believed that by myself a while ago, until reality
> proved me wrong. ;-)
>
> Debian and Skolelinux differ a lot in their preconfiguration and
> especially LDAP. So, we do need packages that are specific to Skolelinux
> once it concerns user and system administration via LDAP.

those packages can still be in Debian. There is no point of having packages 
just in Skolelinux. We did that years ago, but we dont do that anymore (since 
years). All our packages are in Debian. 

And yes, if you install Debian, the result will be different than if you 
install Debian Edu. But both installs use the same *package pool*.

It's similar if you install Gnome vs KDE ;) Or NIS vs LDAP.

> Jonas has packages CipUX (most parts) for Debian, they are in unstable,
> so they are actually more "squeeze" than "Lenny" and therefore not
> working too well with the current stable Skolelinux version.

This is the development list, we mostly care about the upcoming version, which 
atm is squeeze. So this is very fine. 

Whats not so fine is that there are no instructions like 
http://wiki.cipux.org/installation/cipux_340x_debian_edu is for Lenny, but 
for Squeeze. Those would be helpful to have *now* (that squeeze is still in 
development...)

> So, you are saying, since CipUX is in Debian, it will be present as
> installation option for Skolelinux in the next release, yes? Now this is
> a different statement than what Jürgen and Philipp said before.

No, thats not what I said. I said, since its in Debian, you can apt-get 
install it.

> > BTW, now that I have your attention: do you know why cipux-cat-weasel
> > hasnt been packaged yet?
> Actually, we have an "unofficial" package on rp.skolelinux.de, but since
> it build-depends on stuff not packaged in Debian yet, it's complicated.
> Also, there are still a few problems with preconfiguration so that it
> starts out-of-the-box on Skolelinux, which need to be adressed. Martin
> wrote about that. Want to help? :-)

Sorry, but atm I'm interested to get a usuable UI for squeeze. If you say 
catweasel has some unsatisfied build-depends, I'm not interested to help 
here(+now), as new build-depends wont make it into squezee...


cheers,
	Holger

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: