Hi Andi, thanks for your summary and pushing this forward! On Freitag, 22. Oktober 2010, Andreas B. Mundt wrote: > So I suggest not only to have the student and teacher trees, but in > addition have age-groups in the students-tree: +1 > Main > difference to our current setup: Bind instead of powerDNS. > I think the decision we have to take is: > Do we want to continue using powerDNS (which means we cannot use the > GOsa packages because they use bind, so we have to find a solution, > hack something or whatever...) or can we switch to bind which should > make most (if not all) of the tools we need available in the squeeze > repositories. So if there are no grave arguments against bind I think > that's the easier way to go. +1 - I think so too. It's (very) unfortunate that we switched to powerdns just in the last release and now switch back, but I think it's still the best way to go now. :-/ > Finally, as Petter pointed out, netgroups are missing. how bad do we need them? Could we live with a cli-solution only? Or should we try harder to get your patch ready? cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.